This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Both sides previous revision Previous revision | |||
help_out [2018/11/15 22:54] splitbrain [Pattern Cleanup] |
help_out [2018/11/28 16:02] splitbrain |
||
---|---|---|---|
Line 30: | Line 30: | ||
* **Categorize** Some adoption patterns are actually people patterns and vice versa | * **Categorize** Some adoption patterns are actually people patterns and vice versa | ||
* **Examples** More examples from real life wikis for the patterns would be very helpful. For some things screenshots may help | * **Examples** More examples from real life wikis for the patterns would be very helpful. For some things screenshots may help | ||
+ | |||
+ | ===== Classification ===== | ||
+ | |||
+ | We currently classify the Patterns and Anti-Pattern into just two focus groups: | ||
+ | |||
+ | * People - how people' | ||
+ | * Adoption - basically everything else | ||
+ | |||
+ | It probably makes sense to rethink this classification. The adoption focus seems to broad and might be worth to be split up. | ||
+ | |||
+ | Possible other focus areas: | ||
+ | |||
+ | * Content - the different kind of content that fit or not fit the wiki approach | ||
+ | * Permissions - how different approaches to permissions influence adoption | ||
+ | * Technology - what kind of technical features in a Wiki engine can help or hinder adoption | ||
+ | |||
---- struct data ---- | ---- struct data ---- | ||
+ | classification.type | ||
+ | classification.focus : | ||
---- | ---- | ||