This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
— |
talk:wikinoob [2018/11/14 22:14] (current) |
||
---|---|---|---|
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
+ | |||
+ | ---- | ||
+ | |||
+ | Perhaps OverzealousBeginner or NaiveEnthusiast? | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | Posted by Jon Rand at Jul 05, 2007 15:27 | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | ---- | ||
+ | |||
+ | * Good name suggestions. I think this article describes a number of typical blunders that a person that alread somewhat experienced in knowledge managment (in legacy systems) will almost certainly make as they learn how to use wiki philosophy. | ||
+ | |||
+ | * I'm not 100% convinced this is a person anit-pattern in it's own right (as written), but instead a very unfortunate individual who is implementing a large number of // | ||
+ | |||
+ | * I second Jon's implicit suggestion of splitting this into two topics: **one** related to " | ||
+ | |||
+ | * I like [Tarraformer] | ||
+ | |||
+ | * Some of the examples (repeating the title) may be just chalked up to inexperience and don't really fit with what I'm reading as ' | ||
+ | |||
+ | * At risk of wikiTroll ing, I'm not inspired or enthused by the solutions provided to date. It seems to read "If you see anti wiki patterns, use pro-wiki patterns to counter it". It might be easier to identify a solution once this topic is split into more manageable concepts. | ||
+ | |||
+ | * side note: some ' | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | Posted by James Mortimer at Aug 13, 2007 12:55 | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | ---- | ||
+ | |||
+ | Jon,\\ | ||
+ | Great name suggestions! | ||
+ | |||
+ | James,\\ | ||
+ | Your comments are excellent - in principle I agree with Tarraformer but I'm not sure it's a recognizable enough name that people looking for information on this scenario will realize that pattern has the info they need. I'd lean a little more toward NaiveEnthusiast, | ||
+ | |||
+ | Cheers,\\ | ||
+ | Stewart | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | Posted by Stewart Mader at Sep 10, 2007 12:23 | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | ---- | ||
+ | |||
+ | Some other name ideas: | ||
+ | |||
+ | * WIKIWYG - ("wiki wig") What I Know Is What You Get | ||
+ | * MonkeySee - as in " | ||
+ | * Luddite - current way is the best way | ||
+ | * Mimic | ||
+ | * Modeler | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | Posted by David Goldstein at Sep 14, 2007 19:27 | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | ---- | ||
+ | |||
+ | I like Luddite, but I was also drawn to the image of an ostrich for the second meaning (see James' comment). | ||
+ | |||
+ | My offering is **" | ||
+ | |||
+ | * small headed - small minded? | ||
+ | * a bird that is unable to fly - a tool owner who can't use it | ||
+ | * takes pride in ability to run well - whereas other birds fly | ||
+ | * head is in the sand - gets dirt in the eyes and can't see the obvious | ||
+ | * is the biggest bird - think "Big Bird," large, but cartoonish presence | ||
+ | * a person who refuses to face reality or recognize the truth - WordNet | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | Posted by Rick Burnette at Sep 28, 2007 00:22 | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | ---- | ||
+ | |||
+ | Agree this could be split. But what I had in mind originally was definitely not //Naive// nor //Zealous// . // | ||
+ | |||
+ | // | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | Posted by P. Payette at Oct 25, 2007 14:56 | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | ---- | ||
+ | |||
+ | Good article. How about | ||
+ | |||
+ | * Atrophied Thinker | ||
+ | * Petrified Thinker | ||
+ | * Arthritic Thinker | ||
+ | |||
+ | " | ||
+ | |||
+ | It have encountered this kind of thinking we introducing systems with new concepts (not wikis). This how that kind of thinking seems to me. (Provided its not me guilty of it.) | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | Posted by martin.ellis at Nov 01, 2007 22:34 | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | ---- | ||
+ | |||
+ | Do we really need to give it the BEST specific name? why not just a good name? | ||
+ | |||
+ | Currently I'm doing research on which wiki to implement, how to do it, and how not to do it. | ||
+ | |||
+ | I'm reading every article on this website slowly and writing anything I find important to the beginning stages down. So what I'm about to suggest won't work for my method. But the people I suspect you're trying to attract will be those looking for a single point of reference (ie a good wiki). These people will see a "fix your wiki page" (this), then search it, if what they' | ||
+ | |||
+ | Confluence already has a system in place for this. Labels. All these points are good and we're discussing how much better one title is then the next (ie they' | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | Posted by Nick Cliff at Dec 12, 2007 21:09 | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | ---- | ||
+ | |||
+ | I'd like to recommend | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | Posted by Robert Rapplean at Feb 13, 2008 15:41 | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | ---- | ||
+ | |||
+ | NewbieAstray? | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | Posted by Teresa Ruano at Feb 13, 2008 16:52 | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | ---- | ||
+ | |||
+ | I think the name should start with " | ||
+ | |||
+ | Here are examples of what this could yield: | ||
+ | |||
+ | * OldSchoolBusyBee | ||
+ | * OldSchoolDrone | ||
+ | * OldSchoolPatterner | ||
+ | |||
+ | If anybody likes the concept, feel free to play with it. | ||
+ | |||
+ | I think a lot of people commenting here are onto something by suggesting that someone like this can be harnessed to help in positive ways. What you've got is basically someone who wants to help and has embraced the new platform, but has not yet grasped the new paradigm. These people should be treated with patient respect. The wiki paradigm carries with it a shift that goes beyond just the sharing of information. Particularly in strong hierarchical organizations, | ||
+ | |||
+ | Best of luck to all who encounter these people. I really do think that each one has the potential to be a very useful wiki contributor. | ||
+ | |||
+ | Kind regards, | ||
+ | |||
+ | Justis Peters | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | Posted by Justis Peters at Mar 13, 2008 13:42 | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | ---- | ||
+ | |||
+ | MalAdapter is the best one; it directly identifies the core of the problem. " | ||
+ | |||
+ | I'm new to this but am very interested in setting up a wiki so I am literally reading every letter on this site, & clicking all links. I hope to get good advice here and look forward to being an active contributor myself. | ||
+ | |||
+ | My main question is this : this is a discusson that started a year ago. Every single suggestion offered during that year is WAY better than what is still currently being used. Shouldn' | ||
+ | |||
+ | I'm not trying to be a smart-ass here; raising a legitemate question regarding effectiveness. This is the first ever " | ||
+ | |||
+ | Don't let me be dissapointed wiki world!\\ | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | R\\ | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | Posted by Aspiral Architect at May 07, 2008 19:07; last updated at May 07, 2008 20:06 | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | ---- | ||
+ | |||
+ | What about Wikinoob? | ||
+ | |||
+ | As we have already persons like Wikigardener | ||
+ | |||
+ | However, is someone looking to these posts? | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | Posted by Jan-Mark de Witte at Aug 19, 2008 03:52 | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | ---- | ||
+ | |||
+ | But the people I suspect you're trying to attract will be those looking for a single point of reference (ie a good wiki). These people will see a "fix your wiki page" (this), then search it, if what they' | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | Posted by Daniel at Nov 20, 2009 00:10; last updated at Nov 23, 2009 12:55 by barconati | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | ---- | ||
+ | |||
+ | That does not mean that they will always continue to recreate structure where it's not needed. Most likely, the key is to help them feel a sense of belonging and to feel as though their role is clear and useful. | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | Posted by Daniel at Nov 20, 2009 00:11; last updated at Nov 23, 2009 12:55 by barconati | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||